Live Forecasts

Jump to your personalised 14-day planner

Save any location (including your own pins), set swell/wind/tide/weather preferences, and see the best sessions now and next across all your spots.

Go to Forecasts
Back to Learning Center

The Resurgence of the 3-Strut Wing Design

6 min read

Back to the Future?

The 3-strut wing design, reminiscent of early kiteboarding equipment, is gaining market share. While the industry spent years moving toward lighter, single-strut designs, the demand for stability in high winds and power in low winds has brought the 3-strut layout back.

Stability and Low-End Power

The primary argument for the 3-strut design, seen in evolutions from brands like Naish, is canopy tension. The two additional struts support the canopy fabric more effectively than a single center strut. This structure provides better low-end power in light wind conditions because the wing maintains its airfoil shape rather than deforming.

Furthermore, this stability reduces trailing edge flutter during heavy gusts, making the ride smoother and more predictable.

Canopy Tensioning Profiles

A single-strut wing relies heavily on the leading edge diameter to maintain tension. When a gust hits, the large unsupported panels on either side of the strut can "breathe" or distort, dumping power.

In contrast, a 3-strut layout creates a segmented frame. This allows for a tighter, pre-tensioned canopy that reacts instantly to pumping input. The result is a "crisp" feel where every ounce of rider effort translates to forward drive, rather than being absorbed by canopy stretch.

Performance vs. Weight

The stability comes at a cost as a 3-strut wing is typically heavier than a single-strut equivalent. However, new modular boom systems help offset the sensation of weight by allowing the rider to use leverage for freestyle moves.

This design is particularly relevant for intermediate riders who want high-wind control without paying the premium for exotic materials. GONG’s performance series has utilized strut layouts to create wings that are easier to pump than floppy single-strut wings. Observation of industry demos suggests that multi-strut wings maintain better uptime in variable lulls.

Flagging Out: The Drift Debate

Historically, 3-strut wings were criticized for being tail-heavy when flagged out (held by the leading edge handle while surfing). The extra weight of the bladders and struts could cause the wing to oscillate or drop.

However, modern iterations have solved this by tapering the side struts and shifting the center of effort forward. While a dedicated single-strut surf wing will always drift better in light wind, the gap has narrowed significantly. For powered wave riding, the stability of a 3-strut frame can actually be an advantage, as it sits more quietly in the air without flapping.

Pump Fatigue vs. Efficiency

There is a common misconception that a lighter wing is always less tiring. While a 1-strut wing is lighter to hold overhead, it can be physically exhausting to pump because it lacks "spring." You have to work harder to generate lift.

A stiff 3-strut wing, though heavier, offers immediate feedback. One efficient pump yields a surge of power. For heavy riders (>85kg) or in marginal conditions, this efficiency reduces overall fatigue compared to flailing with a soft, light wing.

Design Trade-offs

Feature
3-Strut Design
Single Strut
Canopy Tension
High (Maintains Shape)
Lower (Deforms in Gusts)
Weight
Heavier
Lighter
Best For
Stability, Power, Lulls
Drift, Lightness, Surf

AI-generated content for research only. Verify with real experts, certified instructors, and official sources.

Forecasts made for you

Save any spot (including your own pins), set swell/wind/tide/weather preferences, and scan 14 days to see where to ride now and next.

View Forecasts