Live Forecasts

Jump to your personalised 14-day planner

Save any location (including your own pins), set swell/wind/tide/weather preferences, and see the best sessions now and next across all your spots.

Go to Forecasts
Back to Learning Center

The Mesh: Cubes vs. Triangles

5 min read

Cutting Up the Sky

To calculate weather, computers must divide the atmosphere into small boxes. Traditionally, we used latitude and longitude lines. This creates squares.

The Polar Problem

Look at a globe. The latitude lines get closer together at the North Pole. The squares shrink. This creates math errors called "singularities" at the poles. The computer wastes power calculating tiny squares in the Arctic.

The German Solution (ICON)

The German Weather Service (DWD) invented a model called ICON. Instead of squares, it covers the globe in triangles (an Icosahedral grid).

  • Why it works: Triangles tessellate perfectly. They are the same size at the Equator and the North Pole.
  • The Benefit: The wind flows naturally across the points of a triangle. It models "non-hydrostatic" flow (vertical wind) better than squares.

The Result

ICON is famous for predicting localized wind spikes and thunderstorms better than the square-grid models.

Grid Comparison

Traditional Grid

Latitude/Longitude squares

Problems at poles

ICON Grid

Icosahedral triangles

Uniform coverage

Summary

If you want to know about sudden storms or gusty fronts, look at the ICON model. Its triangular math handles chaos better.

AI-generated content for research only. Verify with real experts, certified instructors, and official sources.

Forecasts made for you

Save any spot (including your own pins), set swell/wind/tide/weather preferences, and scan 14 days to see where to ride now and next.

View Forecasts